64% of Europeans Link Fossil Fuel Cuts to Safety

Millions of Europeans now see cutting fossil fuel imports as essential to keeping their countries safe, according to new polling data that could reshape the continent's energy future.

A YouGov survey across Germany, France, Italy, Spain, and Poland found that 64% of people believe reducing dependence on imported fossil fuels makes Europe safer. The timing matters: the poll was conducted while an energy crisis in the Strait of Hormuz stretched past 100 days.

Eight in 10 respondents said European countries should work together on energy solutions. Most said cooperation has become even more important given current global tensions.

The numbers tell a story of surprising unity. Over two-thirds of those surveyed support reducing fossil fuel dependence for security reasons. Majorities in four countries back government funding for electric vehicles, with Spain leading at 63%.

Heat pump support proved even stronger. Italy showed 71% support for government financial help, followed by France at 66%, Germany at 61%, Spain at 58%, and Poland at 51%.

Perhaps most striking: centre-right voters in Germany, Italy, and France ranked among the most supportive groups for clean energy measures. The issue is crossing traditional political divides.

The Ripple Effect: This polling data hands policymakers something rare in today's fractured politics: a unifying issue with broad public backing. When citizens across the political spectrum agree, real change becomes possible.

The groups behind the poll are pushing three priorities. First, accelerate the rollout of heat pumps, electric vehicles, and charging stations. Second, make reducing fossil fuel use a goal pursued with the same urgency as building clean energy. Third, increase cooperation on power grids, infrastructure, and joint purchasing across EU member states.

The shift in public thinking is significant. Europeans increasingly see the clean energy transition not as an environmental burden but as protection against economic volatility and external threats. Defending fossil fuel dependence now means defending instability.

This creates an opening for a new political narrative around energy: one built on independence, security, and prosperity rather than sacrifice and cost.